In prioritizing multiple targets of the same threat level, what is the first criterion used?

Prioritizing targets in direct fire engagements involves specific criteria to ensure an effective response to threats. The first criterion used when prioritizing multiple targets of the same threat level is “near before far.” This principle is based on the assumption that targets that are closer pose a greater immediate threat to friendly forces. Engaging nearer targets first helps to mitigate risk and protect team members from potential harm.

The rationale behind this approach is grounded in tactical considerations. Targets that are nearer typically have a higher likelihood of affecting operations directly, whether by engaging with weapons, providing covering fire, or influencing the movement of friendly forces. By eliminating these threats first, units can secure their position more effectively and reduce potential risks in the immediate area.

In contrast, other criteria such as stationary before moving or frontal before flank focus on different tactical aspects but do not address the immediate nature of threat proximity in the same way as prioritizing near targets. These considerations of movement or position come into play after assessing which targets are most likely to impact the current situation. Therefore, engaging the nearest target ensures a more calculated and protective approach to direct fire engagements.