What is the implication of prioritizing "Stationary before moving" in target engagements?

Prioritizing "Stationary before moving" in target engagements emphasizes the tactical advantages of engaging targets that do not change position. Stationary targets are generally more predictable and allow for better accuracy when firing since their location remains fixed. This reduces the complexity of the shot and allows for a higher probability of a successful engagement.

Stationary targets can also be easier to identify and track, making it much less likely that they will evade the engagement. This prioritization is rooted in the principle that engaging a target that is not taking evasive action is critical in combat scenarios, where every tactical advantage can significantly impact mission success.

The focus on stationary targets does not imply that moving targets are inherently less threatening or that their size is the primary concern, which would relate to other strategic considerations. Ultimately, by encouraging the engagement of stationary threats first, forces can mitigate greater risks associated with more mobile targets.